←
Browse All Journals Submit Manuscript
Skip to content
Home▶Archive▶Vol. 38 No. 2 (2021)▶BITE MARKS ANALYSIS USING COMPUTER ASSISTED DENTITION…
Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology ›
Print ISSN 0971-1929 · Online ISSN 0974-4568
Submit your paper About the journal
Original Research Paper

BITE MARKS ANALYSIS USING COMPUTER ASSISTED DENTITION OVERLAY METHOD

, ,
Pratik Tarvadi — Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar
Shahnavaz Manipady — Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Kanachur Medical College, Mangalore
Mahabalesh Shetty — Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University
Published 30 Jan 2022 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2021), pp. 134-137
❝ How to cite
Formats:PDF 🔒 Subscription
🔒 PDF

Abstract

Aim: Evaluate the computer assisted dentition overlay method for bite mark analysis. 

Materials and Methods: Impressions of both, maxillary as well as mandibular arches of 50 consenting volunteers were taken and dentition casts were prepared. Computer assisted overlay comparison was carried out. The findings showed that the complete dentition  Computer Assisted Dentition Overlay method dental evidence, and with the proper evaluation and presentation of the dental findings.”1 A part of Forensic Odontology deals with identification. Identification using bite mark analysis is based on the fact that each individual possess an unique dentine.2,3 Reliability of this identification has been accepted legally but controversy persists scientifically.

KeywordsAnalysisphotographAssisted Dentition
🔒 Full text available to subscribers
  • PDF — print-ready version
Log in Subscribe Institutional access
  1. Keiser-Neilsen S.Person Identification by Means of Teeth. John Wright & Sons, Bristol, 1980.
  2. Van der Velden, A, Spiessens. M and Willems G. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology. The J. Forensic. Odonto Stomatology.2006; 24(1): 14-17.
  3. Sweet D, Pretty IA. A look at forensic dentistry Part 2: teeth as weapons of violence identification of bitemark perpetrators. Br Dent J. 2001~190:415–8.
  4. Hale A. The admissibility of bitemark evidence. Southern Californian Law Review 1978;51(3):309-34.
  5. Pramod KD, SV Srinivasan, Rajesh PP. Bite Mark Evidence. A textbook of Forensic Odontology. Paras Publications.1998:69-78.
  6. Hyzer WG, Krauss TC. The bitemark standard reference scale-ABFO No. 2. J Forensic Sci 1988; 33(2):498-506.
  7. David Sweet, Robert E Wood. Computer – Based Production of Bite Mark Comparison Overlays. J Forensic Sci. 1998. 43(5): 1050-1055.
  8. Rathore P, Sood S. Image Perception Technology a New Horizon: A Comparative Study on Bite Mark Analysis. Arch of Dent and Med Res 2015;1(3):9-14.
  9. M. Jonathan Daniel, MihirKhatri, SV Srinivasan, VK Jimsha, FremingstonMarak. Comparison of Inter Canine and Inter-Molar Width as an Aid in Gender Determination: A Preliminary Study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. April-June 2014; 36(2):168-172
  10. Mihir Khatri, Mariappan Jonathan Daniel, and Subramanian Vasudevan Srinivasan. A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013 JanJun~ 5(1): 16– 21.

Looking up citing articles…