Towards Standardizing Medicolegal Practices In India:  Challenges and Solutions

Authors

  • Benjy Tom Varughese Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Ranjit Immanuel James Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Latif Rajesh Johnson Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Silvano Dias Sapeco Former Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Goa Medical College, Goa, India Author
  • Jagadeesh Narayanared dy Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Kar nataka, India Author
  • Adarsh Kumar Director Forensic Science Laboratories, State of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Author
  • Sanjay Gupta Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India Author
  • Mukesh Yadav Principal, Government Medical College, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2025.42.3.14

Keywords:

Evidence, India, Medico-Legal Case, National Medicolegal Code and Manual (MLMC)

Abstract

In India, Medicolegal cases require meticulous examination and evidence collection to support legal investigations, yet  the absence of a standardized national medicolegal code leads to inconsistent practices. Currently, only a few states and  institutions have developed their own codes, leaving many healthcare facilities, particularly in resource-limited settings,  reliant on outdated or ad-hoc protocols. This variability complicates workflows, especially for junior consultants, medical  graduates working in district hospitals performing medicolegal duties and foreign-trained medical graduates unfamiliar  with Indian procedures, risking suboptimal evidence collection and documentation. A national medicolegal code is proposed to standardize protocols for examination, sample preservation, and stakeholder responsibilities, ensuring unifor mity and clarity. Such a code would align with updated criminal laws, address logistical challenges like evidence storage,  and incorporate guidelines for diverse medicolegal scenarios, including sexual violence, autopsies, and disaster victim  identification. Despite challenges in enforceability due to state jurisdiction over law and order, voluntary adoption by  states, endorsed by the Union government, could streamline practices, ultimately improving medicolegal service quality  and aiding the justice delivery system across India. This review article discusses several practical difficulties in medicole gal practice, challenges in creating a national medicolegal code, and proposes recommendations to move forward. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Benjy Tom Varughese, Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology,

  • Ranjit Immanuel James, Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 

  • Latif Rajesh Johnson, Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology,

  • Silvano Dias Sapeco, Former Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Goa Medical College, Goa, India

    Former Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology

References

Medicolegal issues: Guidelines to medical officers [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/medico_legal.pdf

Kumar IK. Appreciation of evidence in suits [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/sites/default/files/workshop%20III.pdf

Dogra TD, Sarma RK. Medicolegal manual AIIMS Delhi [Internet]. 1990 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://tddogra.blogspot.com/2014/02/medicolegal-manual-all-india-institute.html

Owen RL, Lynch MJ. Body Recovery. In: Payne-James J, Byard RW, editors. Encycl Forensic Leg Med. 2nd ed. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 437–43.

Pollanen MS. On the strength of evidence in forensic pathology. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016;12(1):95–97.

AIIMS Bhopal medico-legal manual [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://aiimsbhopal.edu.in/AIIMSFiles/officialDownload/Medico_Legal_Manual_Eng.pdf

Chauhan SR, Goldar K. Medico-legal cases and medical negligence. New Delhi: Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (India); 2012 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://www.esic.nic.in/Publications/ESICMedicoLegalBook.pdf

Haryana medicolegal manual. Government of Haryana: Health Department (India); 2012 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://kaithal.haryanapolice.gov.in/writereaddata/Images/pdf/pkl96.pdf

Medicolegal manual. Government of Punjab: Health Department (India); 2018 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://health.punjab.gov.in/sites/default/files/Punjab%20Medicolegal%20Manual%20jan30.pdf

Kerala medico-legal code. Government of Kerala: Home Department (India); 2011 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://dhs.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/code.pdf

Tamilmani K, Manivasagan M. Tamilnadu medico legal manual [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 May 1]. Available from: https://tnsfmes.com/tn-medicolegal-manual

Moritz AR. Classical mistakes in forensic pathology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1981;2(4):299–308.

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD). The Coroner’s Autopsy: Do we deserve better? London: NCEPOD; 2006.

Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: a Path Forward. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2009. p. 350.

Peterson GF, Clark SC; National Association of Medical Examiners. Forensic autopsy performance standards. Am JForensic Med Pathol. 2006;27(3):200–225.

Mangin P, Bonbled F, Väli M, Luna A, Bajanowski T, Hougen HP, et al. European Council of Legal Medicine (ECLM) accreditation of forensic pathology services in Europe. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(2):395–403.

Mathur S, Patel D, Kumar Adarsh. Uniform and inclusive autopsy performa in India: a cross-sectional study and recommendations thereof. Int J Health Res Medico Leg Prac. 2021;7(1):65–71.

Meilia PDI, Freeman MD, Herkutanto, Zeegers MP. A review of the diversity in taxonomy, definitions, scope, and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018;14(4):460–468.

Meilia PDI, Herkutanto, Atmadja DS, Cordner S, Eriksson A, Kubat B, et al. The PERFORM-P (Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine Pathology version). Forensic Sci Int. 2021;327:110962.

J Kajendran vs The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore & Ors. HCP No. 2182 of 2022. Madras High Court, order dated15.07.2024.

Medico-legal code - orders issued. Government of Kerala: Home Department (India); 2011 [cited 2025 May 2]. Available from: https://dhs.kerala.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/order221011.pdf

Director, Forensic Science Laboratories, Government of Karnataka. Timeline Fixed for receiving samples for analysis at Forensic Science Laboratories. Vide letter no: Staff (3)/10/Nya Vi Pra/2019-20; dated 20.04.2021

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Guidelines and Protocols for Medico-Legal Care for Survivors/Victims of Sexual Violence. 2014 [cited 2025 May 2]. Available from: https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/953522324.pdf

Millo T, Jaiswal AK, Behera C. Collection, preservation and forwarding of biological samples for toxicological analysis in medicolegal autopsy cases: A review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2008;30(2):96–100.

Khan I, Shakeel M, Sharma G. Viscera Preservation for Post Mortem Toxicological Analysis: A Review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2016;38(2):241–245.

Manoj D, Rajesh J, Devnath GP, Rajendiran G, James RI, Johnson LR. Postmortem Toxicology Analysis in India: Rethinking the Future. J For Med Toxicol. 2021;38(2):15–22.

Cordner SM. The Role of the Second Post-Mortem Examination. Medico-Legal Journal. 1985;53(1):24–28.

Milo T. Second postmortem: A need for medicolegal guideline in India. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2008;30(3):176–177.

Dineja R. DNA Sampling Methods and Extraction Techniques in Forensic Odontogenetics - A Review. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2023;45(4):434–437.

Srivastava AK, Kumar A, Kumar A, Srivastava A. Mass Disaster: Identification of Victims with Special Emphasis on Dental Evidences. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2015;37(2):190–195.

Adamovic N, Howes LM, White R, Julian R. Understanding the challenges of disaster victim identification: perspectives of Australian forensic practitioners. Forensic Sci Res. 2023;8(2):107–115.

Byard RW, Winskog C. Potential problems arising during international disaster victim identification (DVI) exercises. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6(1):1–2.

de Boer HH, Roberts J, Delabarde T, Mundorff AZ, Blau S. Disaster victim identification operations with fragmented, burnt, or commingled remains: experience-based recommendations. Forensic Sci Res. 2020;5(3):191–201.

Colville-Ebeling B, Freeman M, Banner J, Lynnerup N. Autopsy practice in forensic pathology - evidence-based or experience-based? A review of autopsies performed on victims of traumatic asphyxia in a mass disaster. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;22:33–36.

Jain AK, Dubey BP, Garg SP, Nigam M. A guide to writing medical reports vis-à-vis victims of torture. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2009;31(3):289–290.

Patowary AJ. Autopsy in Cases of Custodial Torture: Indian Perspective. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2017;39(2):190–197.

Akhade SP, Kothari P, Sabale PR, Chavali KH. Comprehensive Review and Recommendations for Evaluation of Sexual Potency of Male in Context of Current Indian legal system. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2023;45(1):95–100.

Setia P, Shekhawat RS. Photography in Forensic Medicine: Guidelines and Recommendations in the Indian Perspective. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2016;38(1):72–76.

Gouse S, Karnam S, Girish HC, Murgod S. Forensic photography: Prospect through the lens. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(1):2–4.

Henham AP, Lee KA. Photography in forensic medicine. J Audiov Media Med. 1994;17(1):15–20.

Sudha R, Rajasekhar P, Rupesh AK, Deepak GC. Need for National Code for Ethical and Scientific Autopsy Practice. JIndian Acad Forensic Med. 2017;39(4):420–425.

Das S, Das A, Gupta S, Kothakota JN, Chowdhuri S. A New Model of Integrated Forensic Database in India- Road to Future. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2024;46(1):99–102.

Khandekar I, Tirpude B, Murkey P, Pawar V. Development of Clinical Forensic Medicine in India: A need of time. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(1):85–90.

Gorea RK. Comprehensive Forensic Nursing Care of Victims & Families. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2022;44(4):2–5.

Sundaragiri S. Medico-Legal Cases Need a More Professional Approach. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2015;37(3):302–304.

Kadam SS, Akhade S, Desouza K. Autopsy Practice, Potential Sources of Occupational Hazards: A Review for Safety and Prevention. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2015;37(2):196–201.

Abdalla de Oliveira Cardoso T, Bueno de Azevedo Neto F de P, Cynamon Cohen S, Chein Bueno de Azevedo D. Biosafety in autopsy room: a systematic review. Rev Public Health. 2019;21(6):634–642.

Published

2025-10-18

How to Cite

Varughese, B. T., James, R. I., Johnson, L. R., Sapeco, S. D., Narayanared dy, J., Kumar, A., Gupta, S., & Yadav, M. (2025). Towards Standardizing Medicolegal Practices In India:  Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 42(3), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2025.42.3.14