Sex Determination by Morphometric Analysis of the Mental Foramen and Mandibular Ramus from Digital Panoramic Radiography: An Institutional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2025.42.3.5Keywords:
Digital radiography, mandibular ramus, mental foramen, sex determinationAbstract
This study aimed to perform morphometric analysis of the mental foramen and mandibular ramus on digital panoramic images and find a highly significant parameter in determining an individual’s sex. A total of 150 digital panoramic images of 75 males and 75 females, aged between 20 and 50 years, were carefully selected based on inclusion criteria from the Dental Screening program data at the Radiology Department of the National Forensic Sciences University in Gujarat. Morphometric analysis of the mental foramen and mandibular ramus was performed, and measurements were taken on the right and left sides of all the O.P.G. images. Measurements of distances from the superior border of the mental foramen to the lower border of the mandible height (SBM-LBM), inferior border of the mental foramen to the lower border of the mandible height (IBM-LBM), condylar height, projective ramus height (P.R.H.) and coronoid height were taken. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis, and regression function analysis was used to estimate the efficiency of each variable in sex determination. Our study revealed a highly significant relationship in SBM-LBM, IBM LBM distance, and projective ramus height on both the right and left sides. The left side values were higher than the right side in both males and females. SBM-LBM, IBM-LBM, and ramus height values were higher among males than females. SBM-LBM, IBM-LBM, and projective ramus height showed significant sexual dimorphism.
Downloads
References
Picosse M. Tratado de Anatomia Humana. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Interamericana; 1982.
Marzola C. Anesthesiologia. 1st ed. São Paulo: Pancast Editorial; 1989.
Anthony S. Anatomical variations of supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental foramina related to gender and side. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:800–804.
Bhagwatkar T, Thakur M, Palve D, Bhondey A, Dhengar Y, Chaturvedi S. Sex determination using mandibular ramus – a forensic study. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2016 Mar 1;4:1–6.
Hill CA. Evaluating mandibular ramus flexure as a morphological indicator of sex. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Apr;111(4):573–577.
Eckert W, Garland N. The history of the forensic application in radiology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1984;5(1):53–56.
Happonen RP, Laaksonen H, Wallin A, Tammisalo T, Stimson PG. Use of orthopantomographs in forensic identification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1991 Mar 1;12(1):59–63.
Chandra A, Singh A, Badni M, Jaiswal R, Agnihotri A. Determination of sex by radiographic analysis of mental foramen in North Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013;5:52–55.
Thomas CJ, Madsen D, Whittle C. A radiographic survey of the edentulous mandible relevant to forensic dentistry. Leb J Dent Med. 2004;3:15–20.
Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999;195:491–513.
Wical KE, Swoope CC. Studies of residual ridge resorption. Part 1. Use of panoramic radiographs for evaluation and classification of mandibular resorption. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;32(1):7–12.
Youse T, Brooks SL. The appearance of mental foramen on panoramic radiographs: evaluation of patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989;68:360–364.
Philips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen: radiographic position in relation to the mandibular second premolar. J Endod. 1992;18(6):271–274.
Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(2):96–103.
Guler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Bicer I. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(10):741–746.
Atallah HN, Hameed SA, Al-Fadhily ZM, Ibrahim SA. Computed tomographic analysis of mental foramen for age and sex determination in Iraqi population. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2019;7(5):85–88.
Mahima VG. The mental foramen for gender determination: a panoramic radiographic study. Medico-Legal Update. 2009;9:33–35.
Kusum P, Ramanand V. Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010 May 1;17(4):213–215.
Vadovanic M, Dumancic J, Demo Z, Mihelic D. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of mandibles from two Croatian archaeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2006;40:263–277.
Rashid SA, Jamal A. Sex determination using linear measurements related to the mental and mandibular foramina vertical positions on digital panoramic images. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2011;23:59–64.
Tejavathi N, Leena J, Sita G, Noori G, Haritma N. Sex determination by using mandibular ramus: a digital radiographic study. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg. 2017;4(4):5–8.
Khalifa S, Salem HE. Sex determination by morphometric analysis of the mental foramen from digital panoramic radiography. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68(3).
Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56(S1):13–16.
Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex determination – a digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(2):58–62.
Sairam V, Geethamalika MV, Praveen B, Naresh G, Raju GP. Determination of sexual dimorphism in humans by measurements of mandible on digital panoramic radiographs. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Oct–Dec;7(4):434–439.
Nayyar AS, Kartheeki B, Sindhu YU. Accuracy of mandibular rami measurements in prediction of sex. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2017;7(1):25–29.
Pangotra N, Chalkoo AH, Dar N. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for gender determination – a digital radiographic study. Int J Sci Stud. 2018;6(7):42–45.
Lubis M, Anfelia G. Vertical height and horizontal width of mental foramen for sex determination from panoramic radiograph. EC Dent Sci. 2018;17(2):34–38.
