←
Browse All Journals Submit Manuscript
Skip to content
Home▶Archive▶Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025)▶Registered Medical Practitioners: Perception of…
Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology ›
Print ISSN 0971-1929 · Online ISSN 0974-4568
Submit your paper About the journal
Original Research Article

Registered Medical Practitioners: Perception of Professional  Secrecy

, , , , ,
Madhusudan R Petkar — Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyap eeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Sandesh B Datir — Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyap eeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Ashwinikumar B Sapate — Professor (Corresponding Author), Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Ajay Ghangale — Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyap eeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Praveen Arora — Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Aurobindo University, Indore, India
Rahul M Band — Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Published 29 Jul 2025 Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025), pp. 20-26
❝ How to cite 🔗 https://doi.org/10.48165/jfmt.2025.42.2.5
Download PDF

Abstract

Confidentiality is the foundation of the physician-patient relationship, safeguarded by ethical and legal guidelines glob ally. This study evaluates Registered Medical Practitioners’ (RMPs) awareness and perception of professional secrecy,  which is crucial for preventing legal and ethical violations. This cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted at a  tertiary health care teaching hospital, which included 342 RMPs from various specialties. The participants’ knowledge  was assessed using a standardized questionnaire, with responses categorized based on accuracy. The findings indicated  that while RMPs were well-informed about confidentiality in cases of notifiable diseases (75.43%), their awareness dimin ished in complex situations such as disclosing patient information to employers, insurers, or in court (71.92% to 60.52%  incorrect responses). RMPs showed better understanding when the patient’s guardian or hostel warden was involved  (61.11%) but lacked knowledge in areas such as the disclosure of information without patient consent for non-commu nicable diseases. The study identified gaps in the legal and ethical frameworks guiding professional secrecy, highlighting  the need for enhanced training in medical jurisprudence during medical education. Recommendations include manda tory medical jurisprudence training during both undergraduate and postgraduate education to address these knowledge  gaps. The study underscores the importance of continuous education to ensure RMPs comply with ethical standards and  legal requirements, ultimately safeguarding patient privacy and public health. 

 

KeywordsRegistered Medical PractitionerProfessional SecrecyConfidentialityDoctor-Patient relationshipMedical Ethics

The full text of this article is available as a PDF.

Download PDF
  1. Karmakar, R. N. (Ed.). (2007). J. B. Mukherjee’s Forensic Medicine & Toxicology (3rd ed., pp. 55–57). Kolkata: Academic Publishers.
  2. Thompson, I. E. (1979). The nature of confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics, 5, 57–64.
  3. Bajpai, V. (2010). Awareness of medical confidentiality among healthcare professionals in India: A study from Northern India. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 32(4), 308–312. Retrieved from https://www.jiafm.com
  4. Sarkar, S. P., Chatterjee, A., & Mandal, A. (2007). Knowledge and practice of patient confidentiality among healthcare providers in a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 4(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2007.003
  5. Shankar, P. R., & Subba, B. (2011). Student attitudes towards confidentiality in healthcare: An Indian perspective. BMC Medical Ethics, 12(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-23
  6. Das, G., & Banerjee, A. (2013). Medical confidentiality: Perceptions and practices among healthcare professionals in a teaching hospital in Kolkata, India. Journal of Indian Medical Association, 111(5), 315–318. Retrieved from https://www.jima.in
  7. Legal & Government Documents (Online)
  8. Indian Medical Council. (2002, March 11). Code of Ethics Regulations, 2002 [Internet]. New Delhi: Indian Medical Council. [Cited 2014 Apr 23]. Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/RulesandRegulations/CodeofMedicalEthicsRegulations2002.aspx
  9. Ahmad, S. S. (1998, September 21). Supreme Court of India Mr. ‘X’ vs Hospital ‘Z’ [Internet]. [Updated 1998 Sept; cited 2014 Apr]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382721/
  10. Central Government Act. Section 176 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/641385/
  11. Central Government Act. Section 269 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/734195/
  12. Central Government Act. Section 270 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1164731/

Looking up citing articles…

    Copyright © 2025 Madhusudan R Petkar, Sandesh B Datir, Ashwinikumar B Sapate, Ajay Ghangale, Praveen Arora, Rahul M Band (Author)